About MROC Talk

The MROC Talk blog covers the latest developments in Market Research Online Communities (MROCs) and online qualitative research.

Subscribe to MROC Talk

Your email:

Meet the Bloggers

   Matt Foley - Qualitative Research Consultant                       

Matt Foley
, Senior Qualitative Consultant & Managing Partner  


Ben Werzinger - Qualitative Research Consultant
Ben Werzinger
, Senior Qualitative Consultant & Managing Partner

Free Paper - 10 Tips for Successful MROCs

     10 Tips for MROCs

Request a Demo

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Why not use Facebook for an online research community?

Posted on Mon, Nov 03, 2008 @ 11:29 PM
Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Facebook Facebook | Share on Twitter Twitter 
Facebook logo

Facebook - ideal for research?

I was giving a demo of our research community capabilities the other day when out of the blue someone asked me - “Why can’t we just set up an online research community in Facebook?” Wow. This is a complicated question to answer, especially when I haven’t finished my x-large Dunkin Donuts coffee for the day!

I’ll be honest - the question took me back a bit because they actually had a very valid point. Facebook is a great way to connect for ongoing customer insights, and to even create something of an ongoing research community. The people are there, the “essential” technology is there and (chances are) your company already has a presence there - so why not just use Facebook for your online research community?

As with most things in life, it’s not that simple. And I’m not just saying this because I build online research communities for a living :) Read on for reasons why Facebook might not make the most sense as a venue for your online research community.

Reason #1 - Privacy matters

One of the biggest reasons people build a private online community separate from other initiatives is that they want some degree of privacy. For example, they may want to test concepts that have yet to come to market, or brainstorm new products. These companies generally do not want competitors to be privy to these conversations. Facebook is great for conversations that build on the social/viral aspect of the site, but less useful for carefully targeted and private conversations.

Reason #2 - Recruitment & knowledge of participants

If you set up a group or page in Facebook, you know whatever members choose to reveal on their public profiles. You may be able to do a little additional profiling through surveys, but it is then difficult to associate that data back to participants for future activities (at least within the site). When you create your own private online community, that problem largely goes away (depending on the software you’re using and how you have designed your screener). Rather than relying on what people reveal, you can ask much more as part of the screening process and automatically relate that data back to participants for targeted research activities in the community. Just be sure not to violate any research codes or privacy policies in the process!

Reason #3 - You run the show

When you create an online research community, you control everything about the community, from the way it looks to how members interact. You control the frequency in which members are contacted, how they are contacted and what is said in each communication. You also control the frequency, type and depth of research activities. In a public setting like Facebook, you can control some elements, but are ultimately at the whim of the way Facebook is designed and used. Having that degree of control in your own private online community can be very helpful when you’re looking to get targeted answers quickly.

Reason #4 - You “own” the show

Content ownership and control of data can be major issues when it comes to an online research community (as well as with online communities in general). A carefully crafted set of terms and conditions that set your own terms for members can avoid many legal hassles. Run your online research community on Facebook, however, and you’re subject to their terms and conditions. Try running that by your legal team to see which option they prefer :)

Are there any reasons to choose Facebook for an online research community?

In the interest of being fair, there are a few reasons why Facebook can be great for research, including:

    • The built-in pool of participants.
    • The ability to know about participants and even “sniff out” the pros before they arrive.
    • It’s cheap!

There are a few other reasons I didn’t mention in this post, since I’m planning on writing more about it in a separate post. For now, I hope this helped give you a sense of why not (or why) to pursue Facebook as an option for your online research community.

So what have I missed?

Is there something here I’m not considering? Please don’t hesitate to comment below and let me know what I’m missing!

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

There are a couple of other things that make Facebook a better option 
 
1. Turn around time for a survey will be significantly less  
 
2. Since Facebook has 150 million users it will be far more accurate representation of the population and hence better results 
 
3. Niche groups of people are easier to target on face book and hence one can hope to get a more varied and distinct sample  
 

posted @ Monday, March 16, 2009 4:08 AM by anirudh


Hi anirudh, thanks for the comment! For surveys you definitely have valid points here, since it is a large and fairly diverse population. You can also get quick feedback when you need it...  
 
However, for a very targeted and ongoing qualitative study, engaging people through Facebook in a way that allows you to really get what you need from the study can be difficult. The site itself doesn't necessarily allow for the capabilities researchers need to analyze and sub-segment the results. 
 
As always, it depends on the research objectives though... Thanks again for the comment! 
 
Matt

posted @ Monday, March 16, 2009 8:37 AM by Matt Foley


Anirudh, I think you have missed the mark a bit on representativeness. The 150 milllion Facebook users are represntative of... Facebook users, nothing else. The fact there are a lot of them has no impact on being representative of anything else.  
More importantly, if you have no control over who comes into a research project, there are going to be huge and largely unmeasurable biases in the 'sample' that you end up.

posted @ Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:39 AM by Phil Crofts


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.