About MROC Talk

The MROC Talk blog covers the latest developments in Market Research Online Communities (MROCs) and online qualitative research.

Subscribe to MROC Talk

Your email:

Meet the Bloggers

   Matt Foley - Qualitative Research Consultant                       

Matt Foley
, Senior Qualitative Consultant & Managing Partner  


Ben Werzinger - Qualitative Research Consultant
Ben Werzinger
, Senior Qualitative Consultant & Managing Partner

Free Paper - 10 Tips for Successful MROCs

     10 Tips for MROCs

Request a Demo

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Online bulletin board focus group versus a short-term research community

Posted on Thu, Mar 12, 2009 @ 01:49 PM
Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

Recently we were asked about the relative advantages and disadvantages of running a short-term research community (1 month) instead of a week-long bulletin board focus group project.  We thought it was an interesting question worth blogging about, so here are a few of the advantages and disadvantages of running a 1 month community over a 1 week bulletin board...

Advantages of a 1 month community

  1. Explore a topic in-depth - A month-long community will give you more time to really explore a topic from multiple perspectives using a variety of tools (e.g., photos, blogs, etc...), rather than being rushed to fit all of your topics into a single week. 
  2. Adapt the discussion - Rather than focusing on a limited set of questions in a week-long group, a short-term community lets you adapt the conversation around the feedback from early topics, and guide the group naturally to topics that are of interest to them.
  3. Cover more topics - This may seem obvious, but a month-long community will give you time to cover more topics than you could in a bulletin board group.  It will also give you the chance to add in last minute topics you may have forgotten in your initial research plan.
  4. Let the findings "incubate" - Giving participants the time to really think about their answers and articulate their thoughts can lead to more insightful feedback and ideas that might not have emerged in a week long bulletin board group.
  5. Learn more about participants - With a month-long community you can take some time to learn about participants, providing some background and context for their answers to research topics.
  6. More engaging for participants - Depending on the community platform you choose, the experience for participants in an online community setting tends to be much more engaging.  We've tried extending bulletin boards out over a few weeks and have been disappointed with the results as participants drop off from the conversation.  

Disadvantages of a 1 month community

  1. Can be more than you need - If your research needs are limited to a single topic with a limited amount of feedback necessary, a bulletin board might make more sense. 
  2. Turnaround on findings - A bulletin board is generally over in 3-4 days, while a short-term community will be providing ongoing feedback over a month.  If you need a feedback on a single topic asap, then a simple week-long bulletin board might be the way to go.  However, weekly topline reports from the community can also deliver findings quickly. 
  3. Cost - A week-long bulletin board may be slightly less expensive than a community, depending on the number of participants and topics being covered.  However, when you compare the amount you are able to cover in a month long community versus a bulletin board the cost can actually be less, as you would need multiple bulletin boards to cover the same number of topics.

What's the takeaway?

We've done many bulletin board focus groups and online communities here at PluggedIN, and readily acknowledge that each has their own value as a qualitative research methodology.  What you choose will ultimately come down to your research objectives, the depth of feedback that you need and the timeframe in which have available to gather findings.  We hope this breakdown helps you consider some of the relative strengths and weaknesses of each approach as you decide what works best for you and your organization...

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

Hi Matt 
 
Nice one!  
 
You definitely hit the nail on the head when you say that the best approach depends on the research objectives.  
 
Sigh. You would think that it would go without saying (but in my experience it sadly does not) that the objectives should always lead the approach. One size just doesn't fit all. 
 
Cheers! 
 
Katie

posted @ Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:29 PM by Katie Harris


(Ooops. Something weird going on with the bold there!)

posted @ Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:38 PM by Katie Harris


Agree re variety of duration depending on objective. 
 
we have run online community groups for one day through to four months all with different objectives ranging from npd thru to quick concept tests for advertising through to more in-depth studies.  
 
 
 
In addition, the added functionality that online communities give whether it be a blogging facility or multimedia uploads certainly add a dimension that old-style bulletin boards dont provide therefore adding to the richness of the material. 
 
 
 
Cheers

posted @ Saturday, March 14, 2009 12:49 AM by Jenni Beattie


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics